Part 2

By Keith Maart

Part 2: The CIA’s Assessment of Israeli Intelligence: Israel’s Methods and Means to Conduct False Flag Operations Utilizing Deep Cover Operatives and Other Processes

A 2001 Army School of Advanced Military Studies (SAMS) report called the Israeli armed forces a 500-pound gorilla that had been known to disregard international law to accomplish its mission. Of the Mossad, SAMS said: “Wildcard. Ruthless and cunning. Has capability to target U.S. forces and make it look like a Palestinian/Arab act.”[1] In other words, the Mossad has the capability of committing acts of false flag terrorism and making it look like an Arab undertaking. Israel’s use of false flag operations is a well-established fact that was basically corroborated by the CIA twenty-two years earlier.

When the Iranian students captured the US embassy in Tehran in November 1979 a multi-volume CIA and State Department file was found which included a March 1979 CIA Assessment of Israeli Intelligence (“Israeli Intel Assessment”). The Washington Post and Boston Globe ran articles relating to the various CIA documents in early 1982, with the reputable but now defunct Counter Spy-Magazine publishing the entire Israeli Intel Assessment in May-June 1982.[2] A Washington Post article in May 1991, also vouched for the authenticity of the CIA documents that were taken from the U.S. embassy in Tehran.[3]

One of Counter-Spy’s co-founders was ex-CIA agent Philip Agee who became a leading opponent of CIA practices and its support for authoritarian governments in Latin America.[4] Agee resigned from the CIA after 11 years of service in 1968 when he became disillusioned with the CIA’s subversion and sabotage of democratically elected governments and other movements for social justice. In his 1975 book, Inside the Company: CIA Diary, Agree named U.S. intelligence agents in Europe and Latin America.[5]

Ironically, Counter-Spy’s public identification of U.S. intelligence agents led to the 1982 Intelligence Identities Protection Act (IIPA), protecting agents’ identities. The law would later come into play in the investigation of the Valerie Plame (CIA agent) where Dick Cheney’s Chief of Staff, Scooter Libby, leaked her name to the media as retaliation against her husband (Joe Wilson) for contradicting the Bush Administration’s false claims that Saddam Hussein was trying to acquire yellow cake uranium from Nigeria.[6]

The Israeli Intel Assessment is very detailed and specific and provides a summary of each of Israel’s four primary intelligence agencies (i.e., Mossad, Shin Beth, Military Intelligence, and the National Police). Most of the information in the publication has been derived from a variety of sources including covert assets of the CIA, publications of the Israeli Government, and reports prepared by the U.S. Department of Defense. It also lists 19 “Supplementary Overt Publication” sources that mostly include Israeli government and intelligence-related books written primarily by Israeli and Jewish authors.

Former Mossad chief Isser Harel called the assertions of the CIA Assessment of Israeli Intelligence “malicious, dilettantish, distortions… but probably authentic.”
Former Mossad chief Isser Harel called the assertions of the CIA Assessment of Israeli Intelligence “malicious, dilettantish, distortions… but probably authentic.”

The Israeli Intel Assessment provides in depth insight into Israel’s intelligence apparatus, including its methods and processes. In an interview with Israeli newspaper Ma’ariv in the early 1980’s, former Mossad chief Isser Harel (1953-63) called the assertions of the document “malicious, dilettantish, distortions… but probably authentic,” and stated that the publication of the document had been a nightmare for him.[7]Coincidently, in a conversation with Christian Zionist Michael Evans in 1979, Harel allegedly predicted that the tallest building in New York City (i.e., the World Trade Center) will someday be attacked by Islamic fundamentalists.[8] Are these the words of a prophet or spymaster who knew what it would take to bring America to its knees and to side with Israel?

The CIA document basically shows that Israel has the means and experience to carry out false flag attacks by recruiting Arabs as deep cover operatives in covert operations, something they most likely did in the 9/11 operation. Deep cover operatives are often planted years in advance of the execution of an operation and can take on identities and backgrounds to fit the operation (i.e., “covert legends”). Among many other important findings, following are some Israeli intelligence processes and methods that could have been pertinent to the 9/11 operation (references to sections of the Israeli Intel Assessment are given in parentheses):

  • The Israeli intelligence and security community is completely loyal and if the government requested the execution of a certain task, legal or illegal, it would be accomplished. (Section A.3.b)
  • Mossad is also charged with inciting disturbances calculated to create mutual distrust among the Arabs and to draw Western sympathy away from the Arab cause. (Section B.1)
  • Much of the activity against the Arabs in the Near East is based on “deep cover operations” by Israeli illegals or the recruitment of Arabs in third countries followed by their dispatch or normal rotation back home to Arab areas (see Part 3). (Section B.2)
  • Elishu (Eli) Cohen, an Egyptian-born Jew, was involved in Israeli sabotage operations (false flag attacks) against American and British installations in Egypt in 1952. (Section B.2) Cohen’s sabotage operation became known as the Lavon Affair, a confirmed Israeli false flag operation against the US (see Part 8).[9]
  • The assessment provides two examples of past Israeli “deep cover” operations, where Israeli/Jewish operatives were put in place years in advance to establish other identities and backgrounds (i.e., covert “legends”). One operation required Egyptian Eli Cohen to take the identity of a Syrian Arab while the other operation required Israeli Johann Lotz to move to Germany for a couple of years to establish an identity as a German African Corps officer (see Part 3, 4 amd 20). (Section B.2) [10])
  • Israel devotes a considerable portion of its covert operations to obtaining scientific and technical intelligence; this includes attempts to penetrate classified defense projects in the United States and other Western nations (see Part 7). (Section B.4)
  • Many Israelis were born and educated in Arab countries and appear more Arab than Israeli in speech, demeanor and attitude. By forging passports and other identity documents of Arab and Western countries, and providing sound background legends and cover, Mossad has successfully sent into Egypt and other Arab countries Israelis disguised and documented as Arabs or citizens of European countries (see Parts 3, 4 and 20). (Section B.4)
  • Israel has used false-flag recruitment pitches extensively and successfully. In several cases they approached citizens of Western European countries [usually Arab] under the cover of a local NATO intelligence organization for operations in Arab target countries (see Part 8). (Section B.4)
  • Shin Beth has picked up genuine Arab espionage agents on their way back to neighboring countries and doubled them (I.e., turned them into Israeli spies) in coordination with Military Intelligence. (Section C.4)
  • Unofficial Zionist organizations based in Israel and Jewish communities throughout the world also give aid to Israeli intelligence operations when needed (see Part 5). (Section A.2)
  • Mossad activities are generally conducted through Israeli official and semiofficial establishments, deep cover enterprises in the form of firms and organizations (i.e., front companies), some especially created for, or adaptable to, a specific objective, and penetrations effected within non-Zionist national and international Jewish organizations (see Parts 21, 23, and 24). (Section B.4)
  • Israeli government organizations that provide support to Israel intelligence and security community are the Ministries of Finance and Tourism, El Al, and the national shipping line, Zim….Official organizations used for [Israeli intelligence] cover are Israeli Purchasing Missions and Israeli Government Tourist, El Al, and Zim offices. Israeli construction firms, industrial groups and international trade organizations also provide non-official cover (see Part 19). (Section B.4)
  • Individuals working under deep or illegal cover are normally charged with penetrating objectives that require a long-range, more subtle approach, or with activities in which the Israeli government can never admit complicity (see Parts 3, 4, 19, 20, 21, 23, and 24). (Section B.4) That is, to provide “plausible deniability” to the Israeli government.
  • The fact that Lebanon has a mix of Christians, Druze, and Muslim population had made that country attractive for intelligence projects and Israel has covert assets and runs operations in Lebanon (see Part 3). (Section B.1)

The CIA’s Assessment of Israeli Intelligence provides several important points to consider when evaluating Israel’s likely involvement in the 9/11 false flag attacks. First, Israel recruits Arabs from other countries and turns them into spies for Israel to assist in Israel’s various intelligence operations. Secondly, Many Israelis are born and raised in Arab countries and appear more Arab than Israeli. Israel also uses these individuals in covert operations and has provided them with fraudulent documents (including passports) from Western European countries. Thirdly, Israeli intelligence uses “deep cover” operatives who will take on another identity (“legend”) and who will be placed in another country several years in advance of the execution of the covert operation.

Eli Cohen: Egyptian deep cover operative for Israel "and" false flag terrorist (Lavon Affair)
Eli Cohen: Egyptian deep cover operative for Israel “and” false flag terrorist (Lavon Affair)

The Israeli Intel Assessment provided two examples to show how Israel uses “deep cover” operatives in its covert operations. In one example, Eli Cohen, an Egyptian-born Jew, was involved in Israeli sabotage operations against American and British installations in Egypt in 1952. The Mossad recruited Cohen for the covert operation to help develop intelligence networks and acquire political and military information in Syria. Cohen adopted the identity of the late Kamil Amin Thabet, a Syrian-born merchant, who immigrated to Argentina in 1961 where he became an active member of the Arab community. Cohen eventually returned to Syria in 1962 where he was assisted by two Arabs who had previously been recruited by the Israelis. Cohen made numerous contacts with Syrian political and military personnel, and was eventually caught in Syria (1965), convicted of spying for Israel and hanged.[11]

The second example of an Israeli “deep cover” operative is Johann Wolfgang Lotz (aka Zeev Gur Arich), an officer in the Israeli Military who went undercover in 1959 as a former Nazi officer to infiltrate special weapons activity by German scientists in Egypt. After receiving training in Israel he went to Germany, married a German woman (while still being married to an Israeli woman), and surfaced as an East German refugee and former African Corps officer. Lotz then moved to Cairo (1960/61) and opened a riding academy where he made the acquaintance of a number of prominent and well-placed Egyptians. Lotz also made a number of trips to Western Europe for debriefing and was eventually caught and imprisoned in 1965 and sent back to Israel in 1968 in a prisoner trade.[12]

Much of the above Israeli intelligence modus operandi was apparently put into action in the 9/11 false flag operation. Parts 7 and 8 will describe Israel’s well documented history of false flag operations and damaging counterintelligence crimes against the U.S.A., while Part 3, 4, and 20 will provide additional evidence that Israel most likely recruited at least a couple of the Hamburg pilot hijackers as deep cover operatives for the 9/11 covert operation.

Part 2: References and Endnotes:

[1]  Rowan Scarborough, “Mossad Can Target US Forces Framing Arabs: US Troops Would Enforce Peace Under Army Study,” The Washington Times, September 10, 2001.

SAMS assessment of the Mossad and Israeli military was in conjunction with a hypothetical plan for sending peacekeepers to Israel in the event that Israel and Palestinians agree to a peace plan and the creation of a new Palestinian state. The report attempts to predict events in the first year of a peacekeeping operation and then assess the possible dangers for US troops on both sides.

[2]  CIA Assessment of Israeli Intelligence, March 1979, published May-June 1982 by Counter Spy Magazine, and reprinted at at the following website:

[3]  David Ignatius, “Bungles, Bobbles and Spies; The Tehran Papers: Portrait of the CIA in a Maze of Its Own Design,” Washington Post, May 5, 1991. As reprinted on the Serendipity website:

[4]  Counter-Spy Magazine,,

[5]  Philip Agee, Wikipedia,

[6] John Crewdson, “The Muder that Sparked Identities Protection Act,” Chicago Tribune, March 12, 2006,

[7]  CIA Assessment of Israeli Intelligence, March 1979

[8]  “Is America in Bible Prophecy,”, the article is from an interview with Christian Zionist Michael Evans in August, 2004, and reprinted at the following website:

[9]  Wikipedia, Lavon Affair.

[10]  Like Johann Lotz who ran an Israeli deep cover operation out of Germany, there is evidence that Israel also used Germany to run deep cover operatives in the 9/11 operation. Mohammed Atta went to Hamburg, Germany, in July 1992 to attend school, and Ziad Jarrah and Marwan Shehhi both moved to Germany in April 1996. According to the 9/11 Commission Report (Section 5.3), it was in Hamburg that the three pilot hijackers allegedly became radicalized fundamentalists (see Parts 3, 4, and 20). Or did they just take on covert legends like Eli Cohen and Johann Wolfgang Lots?         

[11]  CIA Assessment of Israeli Intelligence, Section B.2, Ibid.

[12] Ibid.

Part 1

By Keith Maart

Part 1: Notable individuals Endorsing Israel’s Involvement in the 9/11 False Flag Operation and the Author’s 9/11 Theory based on the Actual Evidence

In an interview in December 2007 with Italy’s most respected newspaper, Corriere della Sera, ex-Italian President Francesco Cossiga stated (Italian to English translation), “While all the [intelligence services] of America and Europe….now know that the disastrous 9/11 attack had been planned and realized by the CIA and the Mossad with aid of the Zionist world in order to put under accusation the Arab countries in order to induce Western Powers to take part…in Iraq and Afghanistan wars.” [1]

Although Cossiga’s interview and his accusations were covered in the press in many European countries, not a word of Cossiga’s interview found its way into the U.S. mainstream media. Coincidentally, Cossiga was also (according to his own admission) a member of Operation Gladio, a NATO/CIA-supported covert operation in Western Europe which used state-sponsored false flag terrorism and the murder of innocent civilians to try to frame legal communist party opponents in Italy as late as the 1990.[2]

Dr. Alan Sabrosky: "Only two intelligence agencies had the expertise, assets, access and political protection to execute 9/11 in the air and on the ground. Our CIA and Israel's Mossad."
Dr. Alan Sabrosky: “Only two intelligence agencies had the expertise, assets, access and political protection to execute 9/11 in the air and on the ground. Our CIA and Israel’s Mossad.”

Dr. Alan Sabrosky received the Superior Civilian Service Award in 1988 after more than five years of service at the U.S. Army War College as Director of Studies and is a holder of the General of the Army Douglas MacArthur Chair of Research.[3] He received his PhD from the University of Michigan and is now a writer and consultant specializing in national and international affairs. Sabrosky is also part Jewish and believes Israel’s Mossad was a primary participant in the 9/11 false flag operation.

In a September 2009 article Sabrosky writes, “Only two intelligence agencies had the expertise, assets, access and political protection to execute 9/11 in the air and on the ground: Our CIA and Israel’s Mossad. Only one had the incentive using the “who benefits” principle: Mossad.” Sabrosky points out in the article that it would have been impossible to stage 9/11 without the full resources of both the CIA and Mossad and that 9/11 served the interests of both agencies well.[4] In a 24-minute interview with Press TV in July 2011, Sabrosky discusses in detail Israel’s (via Mossad’s) motivation and evidence tying them to the 9/11 attacks.[5]

Dr. Kevin Barrett is a PhD Arabist-Islamologist who has taught at colleges and universities in San Francisco, Paris, and Wisconsin. He has co-authored five books since Sept. 11, including his latest, We Are NOT Charlie Hedo (co-authored with Paul Craig Roberts). Barrett has appeared on Fox, CNN, PBS and other broadcast outlets and has also inspired feature stories and op-eds in The New York Times, The Associated Press, the Chicago Tribune, and other leading publications.[6] Several of the featured articles discussed Barrett’s right to teach a class on Islam at the University of Wisconsin that discussed among other things, alternative theories to the U.S.G.’s in the 9/11 attacks. Despite 60 state of Wisconsin legislators petition to have Barrett fired, the university allowed Barrett to teach the class in 2006 but did not employ him for subsequent classes.[7]

Dr. Barrett has made significant sacrifices in pursuing actions and beliefs that were detrimental to his livelihood so the truth could be told. He recently stated, “I think it’s [the 9/11 Truth Movement] the most important issue of the 21st century….Anyone interest in participating responsibly in democratic governance needs to investigate this issue.”[8] Dr. Barrett has his own website at and is a featured journalist for and He recently stated in an interview on Press TV that the Sept. 11 attacks were a false flag operation carried out jointly by U.S., Israel and Saudi Arabia with “Zionists playing the lead role.”[9]

In April 2012, investigative journalist Chris Bollyn published a book, Solving 9-11: The Deception That Changed the World, which describes dozens of Israeli/Zionist connections to the 9/11 attacks and its cover-up, and supports Cossiga’s and Sabrosky’s conclusions that 9/11 was a false flag operation carried out by Israel, certain neoconservative (“neocon”) individuals in the U.S. government with ties to Israel, and a number of other Zionist individuals and institutions. Bollyn states in the book’s preface, “My hypothesis that 9/11 was an act of false flag terrorism carried out by Israeli military intelligence and Zionist fifth columnists has not been accepted by many in the so-called 9/11 truth movement because it breaks the cultural taboo regarding how Israel and Jews are viewed in America.”[10]

Robert David Steele: “Bollyn's book connects the dots of all the dual Israeli-U.S. citizens in the U.S. Government and commercial circles that were active participants in the 9/11 false flag operation.”
Robert David Steele: “Bollyn’s book connects the dots of all the dual Israeli-U.S. citizens in the U.S. Government and commercial circles that were active participants in the 9/11 false flag operation.”

Among Bollyn’s 55 five-star reviews (out of 75) at Amazon is one by intelligence author and 20-year CIA and Marine Intelligence officer Robert David Steele.[11] Steele was the senior civilian (Deputy Director) in the Marine Corps who was responsible for creating the Marine Corps Intelligence Center and has authored or co-authored over a dozen books on intelligence (Steele is also the number 1 Amazon reviewer for non-fiction books across 98 categories). He is widely recognized as the leader of Open Source Intelligence (OSINT) and founded and headed up the Open Source Solutions Network and later the Earth Intellligence Network which runs the Public Intelligence Blog.[12]

Steele writes in his review, “The book connects the dots of all the dual Israeli-U.S. citizens in the U.S. Government and commercial circles that were active participants in the 9/11 false flag operation.” Steele further states that the book, “Integrates, for the first time, the history of Israeli false flag operations, the 1980 recognition by Israel that an attack on NYC and specifically against the tallest building in NYC whatever that might be, and the total complex context of 9/11 as both a catalyst for forcing the U.S.A. into a “war on terror” and a cover-up for the most massive financial crimes in history.”[13]

What makes the above individuals so certain that Israel and other Zionist individuals and institutions were primary participants in the 9/11 attacks is a plethora of facts and evidence. Anyone who has looked beyond the white-washed pages of the pitiful 9/11 Commission Report knows that 9/11 blood is all over the Star of David along with certain individuals of the USG and its national security apparatus.

It is this author’s conclusion, based on all the facts and evidence concerning the 9/11 attacks and its subsequent cover-ups, that the 9/11 false flag operation was primarily a joint endeavor by certain individuals in the U.S.G. and its national security apparatus (i.e., a number of neocon officials in the Bush White House and select individuals in the CIA and military intelligence – see Parts 15 to 18 ), Israeli intelligence (i.e., primarily Mossad and Israeli Military Intelligence – see Parts 19 to 26 ), along with certain Zionist individuals and institutions working with Israel inside the U.S.A. (see Parts 28 to 33). However, many of the operation’s functions were compartmentalized and not everyone involved was privy to the entire scheme and its purpose.

The evidence also indicates that Israel and Zionist individuals in the U.S. were most likely responsible for the demolition of the three WTC towers that provided the shock and awe event that sold the American public that the country needed to go to war with Middle East countries that had nothing to do with the 9/11 attacks but were coincidently security threats to Israel (see Part 14). American individuals and institutions would not wire buildings that they knew would kill thousands of innocent U.S. citizens, but Israeli nationals and Zionists with dual loyalty to Israel would not have a problem with that part of the operation if sanctioned by certain Israeli leaders and Israeli intelligence. Israel clearly had the human and technical resources in the U.S.A. on Sept. 11, to accomplish their functions of the operation (see Parts 23, 24, and 27).

The evidence also shows that Israel probably handled and instructed the three crucial Hamburg pilot hijackers who were most likely deep cover operatives who wittingly infiltrated the loose-knit al-Qaeda organization (see Parts 3, 4, and 20). Select individuals in the U.S.G. and its military took care of the planes side of the operation and made sure there were no U.S. fighters to intercept the four rogue planes while certain individuals in U.S. intelligence (primarily the CIA, but also some officials in the FBI and NSA) helped provide cover for the alleged hijackers along with a few Israeli communication companies in the U.S. that provided other services critical to the operation (see Part 24).

Shayna Steinger: Issued 12 of the alleged Saudi Arabia "muscle" hijackers U.S. visas in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Shayna Steinger: Issued 12 of the alleged Saudi Arabia “muscle” hijackers U.S. visas in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

The evidence further indicates that Saudi Arabia intelligence played a secondary role in handling some of the less strategically important Saudi hijackers and in helping finance some of the operation;[14] however, the Saudi’s part of the operation was carried out with select U.S. intelligence supervision and cover/protection. Coincidently, 12 of the American visas given to the alleged Saudi “muscle hijackers” were issued by an apparent American Jewish woman (sayan) by the name of Shayna Steinger (see Part 33). Many of the visas Steinger issued to the muscle hijackers had errors and/or were given under questionable circumstances.[15]

Israel and Saudi Arabia have very close military and intelligence ties to the U.S. and their interests were aligned in the 9/11 attacks and the subsequent “War on Terror” which eliminated common enemies of the two countries (see Part 14).[16] [17] Nevertheless, the two primary participants and biggest beneficiaries of 9/11 and the subsequent wars that were fought with 9/11 as the pretext were the State of Israel and the U.S. national security apparatus/military-industrial-complex, and this article series will provide the evidence showing Israel’s involvement and guilt.

Part 1: References and Endnotes:

[1]  Joseph Watson, “Ex-Italian President: Intel Agencies Know 9/11 An Inside Job, “Prison Planet, December 4, 2007 (note: Cossiga’s interview and quote is from translation from Italian to English).

[2]  “Operation Gladio”, Wikipedia,

[3]  Dr. Alan Sabrosky Biography, Veterans News Now,

[4]  Dr. Alan Sabrosky, “Treason, Betrayal and Deceit: 9/11 and Beyond,”, September 20, 2010,

[5]  Dr. Alan Sabrosky Interview, Press TV – The Autograph, July 13, 2011,

[6]  Dr. Kevin Barrett, Biography,,

[7]  Dr. Barrett’s right to teach a class at the University of Wisconsin, Madison, that briefly discussed alternative theories to the U.S.G. made national headlines in 2006 and were published at the following:

  • The New York Times:
  • The Chicago Tribune:
  • The Associated Press:

[8]  Dr. Kevin Barrett, “9/11 Attacks Carried Out by U.S., Israel and Saudi Arabia,”, December 21, 2013,

[9] Author Implores Canadians to Speak Truth to Power, The Jasper Local (Canada),  August 2015,

[10]  Solving 9-11: The Deception That Changed the World, Christopher Bollyn, April 2012, Preface.

[11]  Robert David Steele Biography, Strategic Studies Institute,

[12] Nafeez Ahmed, “The Open Source Revolution is coming and it will Conquer the 1% – ex-CIA Spy,” The Guardian (UK), June 19, 2014,

[13]  Robert David Steele’s book review can be found at:

[14]  There is evidence that Saudi Arabia intelligence helped handle alleged Saudi hijackers Hani Hanjour (alleged pilot of AA 77), Khalid Mihdhar and Nawaf Hazmi. The other 12 alleged Saudi hijackers are often referred to as the “muscle hijackers” who came to the U.S. only several months before the 9/11 attacks. They were apparently true patsies in the operation and were not involved in important strategic aspects of the operation like the three Hamburg pilot hijackers.

[15] Eleven of the thirteen alleged muscle hijackers, and alleged Saudi pilot hijacker Hani Hanjour, had their American visas issued at the U.S. consulate in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. The State Department official who approved the all these visas was Shayna Steinger, which is a probable Jewish surname (see Part 33 for more detail). A very good and detailed discussion of Shayna Steinger’s involvement in issuing many of the questionable visas can be found at at the following link:

Note: A simple Google search, “Steinger, Jewish” provided over ten pages of Jewish individuals with that surname (with a fair amount of repeats). There were two women, Elaine Steinger and Jessica Steinger who are confirmed Jews from the Des Moines, Iowa area. A search for Shayna Steinger on shows that she lived in various places in the Des Moines area and has “possible relations” with an Elaine and Jessica Steinger (Note: Ms. Stenger Jewish and 9/11 connections will be discussed in detail in Part 33).

For the record, this author challenges Ms. Steinger to show that she is not Jewish and a likely Israeli intelligence sayanim (see Part 5) by providing her with an all expense paid one-week “plus” l$1,000 vacation back to the Des Moines neighborhood where she grew up so we can talk to the family and friends who knew her best (please see my Contact page Ms. Steinger or email directly at

[16]  Both Israel and Saudi Arabia have very close ties to the American military and intelligence apparatus. Israel is the largest beneficiary of U.S. Aid and receives about $3 billion per year of which about 75% is used to purchase U.S. weapons (Wikipedia: ), while Saudi Arabia is consistently the largest purchaser of U.S. weapons. In Oct. 2010, the U.S. State Department announced a $60 billion sale of U.S. weapons to Saudi Arabia, making it the biggest arms sales in American history. (Wikipedia: ).

[17] All the wars fought to date under the pretext of 9/11 and the “war on terror” have benefited both Israel and Saudi Arabia. The U.S. has already taken out two of Israel’s/Saudi Arabia’s biggest enemies (Saddam Hussein in Iraq and Muammar Gaddafi in Libya), is currently attempting to take out another (Bashar Assad in Syria), while Israel and Saudi Arabia is trying their best to have the U.S. do the same for the Ayatollahs in Iran. Indeed, the two biggest opponents against the Iran nuclear agreement are Israel and Saudi Arabia who are both heavily lobbying against the deal (UK Telegraph, “Israel and Saudi Arabia Present United Front Over Iran Deal:” ).


By Keith Maart


Bibi Netanyahu. Oops, did I really just say that the 9/11 attacks were "very good" for U.S. and Israeli relations?
Bibi Netanyahu. Oops, did I really just say that the 9/11 attacks were “very good” for U.S. and Israeli relations?

On the evening of September 11th, Israel’s Benjamin Netanyahu was asked what the 9/11 attacks meant for relations between the US and Israel. Netanyahu initially replied, “It’s very good,” and then corrected himself, saying, “Well, not very good, but it will generate immediate sympathy.”[1] In April 2008, Netanyahu added, “We [Israel] are benefiting from one thing, and that is the attack on the Twin Towers and Pentagon, and American struggles in Iraq…. [These events] swung American public opinion in our favor.”[2] Israel was indeed a huge beneficiary of the anti-Muslim and anti-Arab feelings produced by 9/11, and Israel benefited from the planned and subsequently implemented Middle East wars and conflicts, which greatly improved their national security.

A May 2002 article in The New York Times confirmed the benefit to Israel, stating, “American sympathy for Israel has been on the rise, a trend that has been on display in Congress and in recent opinion polls. This month both houses of Congress expressed unqualified support for Israel in strongly worded resolutions, and Washington never seemed more firmly in Israel’s camp.”[3] The Times also pointed out that CBS and Gallup polls in April 2002 showed sympathy for Israel at around 50 percent, about 10 points higher than in previous surveys over the last five years, while sympathy for the Palestinians dropped to 11 percent from 15 percent over the same time period. According to Norman Ornstein of the American Enterprise Institute, “I don’t think we would have the same level of enthusiasm for Israel if Sept. 11 had not happened.”[4]

Israeli intelligence was even a critical partner in the erroneous intelligence findings that supported the Iraq war. According to ex-Israeli general and senior Israeli military intelligence officer Shlomo Brom, “Israeli intelligence was a full partner with the U.S. and Britain in developing a false picture of Saddam Hussein’s weapons of mass destruction capability.”[5] Brom told the Associated Press in December 2003 that Israeli intelligence “badly overestimated the Iraq threat to Israel and reinforced the American and British belief that the weapons existed”[6] (see Part 16). Brom noted that the Israeli assessment may have been influenced by politics. “Israel has no reason to regret the outcome of the war with Iraq, “noting that Saddam was an implacable enemy of Israel.[7]

Without 9/11 there would not have been an Iraq war, a war that eliminated one of Israel’s most feared enemies, an enemy which fired an estimated 40 scud missiles at them during the 1991 Gulf War.[8]  With 9/11 as pretext, the U.S. could, and did, fight Israel’s Middle East wars, starting with Iraq. Coincidently, a large cadre of U.S. neoconservatives (“neocons”), many with very close ties to Israel and its most powerful and influential leaders, started planning and lobbying for various Middle East wars about a decade before 9/11, with Iraq being the first target (see Part 14). Other countries that the neocons and Israel regarded as security threats, and thus slated for attack and regime change, included Syria, Libya and Iran. Libya was subsequently attacked, Syria is under attack and Israel has continuously pressured the U.S. to attack Iran.

Who benefited the most from the 9/11 attacks?
Who benefited the most from the 9/11 attacks?

Cui bono is a Latin term that means “for whose benefit?” It’s a question often asked by law enforcement personnel based on the belief that the individuals or institutions guilty of committing a crime are most likely to be found among those who have the most to gain. In the 9/11 operation, two parties in particular stand out as the largest beneficiaries of the attacks: Israel and the U.S. national security apparatus (i.e., the military-industrial complex, intelligence and homeland security), both of which reaped huge economic and geopolitical benefits, and not by accident. Since 9/11, approximately $2 trillion has been spent on wars, accompanied by over $300 billion of annual spending increases to the combined military/intelligence/homeland security budgets, while attacking countries that posed little or no threat to the U.S. but were enemies of, and security threats to, Israel.[9]

In a typical criminal investigation, the suspects are not usually associated with the investigators and prosecutors of the crime, as they were in the 9/11 investigations. Indeed, intelligence institutions like the CIA and FBI, which committed dozens of serious intelligence failures that led to the success of the attacks, basically investigated themselves. These complicit and untrustworthy institutions never looked into any evidence contrary to the Official 9/11 Story (itself a “conspiracy theory”), and the crime of the century was miraculously solved within days of the attacks. Coincidentally, the CIA and FBI investigations themselves, as well as the 9/11 Commission Report, all relied on circumstantial evidence, much of which has not been proven to this day.

Key Zionist investigators, prosecutors and judges were also in place on 9/11 to stymie investigations and court cases where the process of “discovery” could have led to evidence contrary to the Official 9/11 Story (see Parts 30 to 33). There was also little-to-no transparency or disclosure in any of the 9/11 related investigations and not one person has ever been held accountable for the numerous 9/11 intelligence failures. The 9/11 investigations ignored some of the most important principles of democracy and justness and was based on unreliable torture testimony.

In a criminal court case guilt has to be proven “beyond a reasonable doubt” and in a civil case, guilt can be established based on a “preponderance of the evidence.” In both processes purely circumstantial evidence can be used to convict, but the evidence has to be more compelling in the former. Unfortunately, in the 9/11 investigations, almost all the evidence available from law enforcement personnel, particularly the FBI, CIA and NSA, has been shrouded in secrecy and never made public. As an example, an FOIA release of an FBI investigation into Israel’s possible foreknowledge of, and connections to, the 9/11 attacks resulted in about 600 heavily redacted pages being made available and nearly 1,300 pages being withheld (see Part 21, the “Dancing Israelis”).

In the absence of transparency and accountability in the 9/11 investigations, one has to weigh all the available evidence in determining guilt. The purpose of this series of articles is to provide the facts and evidence showing Israel’s primary involvement in the 9/11 attacks, a topic ignored by most of the 9/11 researchers in the so-called 9/11 Truth Movement (see Part 35). This multi-part series will provide the most comprehensive examination up to now of the evidence implicating Israel in the execution and cover-up of the 9/11 false flag operation, while also revealing Israel’s motives and means.

These articles are impeccably researched and referenced with primarily mainstream media (“MSM”) articles and government documents. Although much evidence is still kept secret by the USG the preponderance of available evidence shows a very high probability that Israel was a primary conspirator in the false flag operation. Among other important findings, the article series will show (note: also see the Table of Contents menu related to the article series):

  • Israeli intelligence’s (mostly the Mossad’s) confirmed use of Arab and Israeli citizens as deep cover operatives for Israeli intelligence and the use of Jewish individuals (sayanim) and institutions throughout the world to aid and support Israel’s worldwide intelligence operations. (Parts 2, 5 and 6)
  • Evidence that pilot hijackers Mohammed Atta and Ziad Jarrah were probably deep cover operatives working for Israeli intelligence (Parts 2, 3, and 20)
  • A history of Israel’s many counterintelligence crimes, false flag attacks, and illegal covert operations against the U.S.A. (Parts 7 , 8, 9, and 10)
  • Top-level Jewish neocons in the Bush White House on 9/11 who had close ties to Israel and/or the military industrial complex. (Parts 11, 15, 17, and 18)
  • Top-level Jewish neocons in the Bush White House on 9/11 who were main proponents behind the Iraq War and/or who were previously investigated for spying for Israel. (Parts 12 and 16)
  • The history of Israel’s and the neocons’ decade-long propaganda campaign for various Middle East wars, starting with Iraq. (Part 14)
  • Israeli individuals (known as “the Dancing Israelis”) and an Israeli organization (namely, Zim Shipping) with demonstrable foreknowledge and likely involvement in the 9/11 false flag operation. (Parts 19 , 21, and 22)
  • Other Israeli individuals and institutions involved in the 9/11 covert operation including the so-called Israeli Art Students and various Israeli communication companies in the U.S. on 9/11. (Parts 23 and 24)
  • The Jewish-American sayanim who were likely involved in the World Trade Center demolition operation and its subsequent cover-up. (Parts 28)
  • Jewish-American sayanim who were involved in other compartmentalized 9/11 operations, including the investigations and subsequent legal cover-up. (Parts 30, 31, 32, and 33)
  • Incriminating timelines showing connections among various Israeli and U.S. sayanim individuals and groups and the alleged 9/11 hijackers. (Part 34)
  • A comparison of the facts and evidence in this multi-part series with that provided by the so-called 9/11 Truth Movement, and the likely reason for that Movement’s ignoring Israel’s involvement in the 9/11 attacks. (Part 35)

The evidence provided in this series will show that Israeli intelligence and a number of Zionist/Jewish individuals (i.e., sayanim) in the U.S. with close ties to Israel, were involved in the 9/11 false flag operation and its cover-up. The absence of transparency and accountability in the 9/11 investigations should be a red flag that Americans are still being lied to and that the U.S. national security apparatus which investigated the crimes continues to hide material evidence and the truth. Unfortunately, as long as some of the individuals and institutions who helped commit the crimes remain the investigators and prosecutors of those crimes, America will never know what really happened on that fateful day in September 2001.

Introduction Endnotes and References:

[1]  James Benet, “Spilled Blood is Seen as Bond that Draws 2 Nations Closer,” New York Times, 9/12/01.

[2]  “Report: Netanyahu Says 9/11 Terror Attacks Good for Israel,” Ha’artez (Israel), April 16, 2008.

[3]  Patrick E. Tyler, “Mideast Turmoil: Opinions: Shock of Sept. 11 Is Making Americans More Supportive of Israel, Polls Suggest,” The New York Times, May 13, 2002.

[4] Ibid.

[5]  The Associated Press, “General: Israelis Exaggerated Iraq Threat,” December 4, 2003. As reprinted in December 4, 2003 USA Today:

[6]  Ibid.

[7]  Ibid.

[8]  Norman Friedman, “Desert Victory – The War for Iraq Kuwait,” Naval Institute Press, 1991. As partially reprinted by PBS Frontline at:

[9]  The military budget was approximately $335 billion in 2001 versus $717 billion in 2011, while the intelligence budget has increased from about $40 billion to $80 billion over the same time frame. The Department of Homeland Security did not even exist in 2001 and is now a $70 billion operation.